Please note that we are unable to offer free legal advice. Our consultation team are here to take your case details and explain any costs involved.
Our team is ready to answer any questions
Book your consultation today
We report on a case that has met with much consternation amongst the HR community. But how did it come to this?
Background
The Claimant in this case, Shannon Gleeson, a flight attendant, was given 2 sandwiches (a croquet-monsieur and a bacon baguette) by her manager during an easyJet flight. She has a nut allergy and was unable to find something suitable to eat before the flight left.
Although Ms Gleeson had been employed by easyJet for 3 years, she was subsequently pulled to a meeting to discuss having the sandwiches. She was dismissed because she had not made suitable enquiries as to whether or not they had been paid for.
The case found its way to an Employment Tribunal who held that Ms Gleeson had been wrongfully dismissed, because there was no clear cut policy that required her to insist that on a receipt (to show that the food had in fact been paid for).
The Tribunal was clearly unimpressed by the evidence given by the manager responsible for the dismissal, who said that he would refuse a cup of tea purchased by colleagues if they had not shown him a receipt for it.
Implications
The reputational damage to easyJet is obvious. To deal with situations such as this very clear policies are needed.
easyJet have since settled the claim.
To speak to a qualified employment solicitor at Springhouse Solicitors, fill in the form
below or call 0800 915 7777.
Please note that we are unable to offer free legal advice. Our consultation team are here to take your case details and explain any costs involved.
Address:
Holborn Gate, 330 High Holborn, London, WC1V 7QH
Tel: 0800 915 7777
Thank you for subscribing. We will keep you updated with all the latest news from Springhouse Solicitors.
Copyright: Kilgannon & Partners LLP