hello@kilgannonlaw.co.uk

Our team is ready to answer any questions

0800 915 7777

Book your consultation today

Can you retract a resignation?

Notice, once given, cannot generally be withdrawn unless the other party consents. There have been numerous cases dealing with the issue of a disputed resignation over the years but, the general rule remains. Individuals should therefore be absolutely sure of the effect they want to achieve before giving notice of their choice to resign as they are unlikely to be able to retract it.


The notice clause

All employment contracts should contain a notice clause setting out what both the employer and employee have to do to terminate employment. Specifically, the clause will set out how much notice must be given by one party to the other (weeks or months). Usually, the clause will say that notice has to be given in writing but, this is not always the case – occasionally it may be permissible to give it orally. It is however, always advisable to give notice in writing (and make sure it is dated) to avoid any dispute later on.


Does an employer have to accept a resignation?

Employers may talk about “accepting” someone’s choice to resign but, this is misleading. As long as the employee is doing what the notice clause in the contract requires i.e. giving it in the form and duration specified, an employer cannot stop someone resigning. While they may try their best to urge someone to reconsider – so that both parties then agree the notice will not be operative – an employer cannot force someone to carry on working against their will if they have indicated they want to leave.


Are there any exceptions to withdrawing a resignation?

While the general rule is that notice cannot be unilaterally withdrawn, the party receiving the notice needs to satisfy themselves that the giver of the notice really did intend to give notice of resignation (or dismissal). In cases involving oral notice, did the employee really mean what they apparently said? Usually there will be no doubt whatsoever but, in appropriate cases, the recipient of the notice should allow the giver a “cooling off” period before acting on the notice to resign.


Where words may have been said in the heat of the moment, this limited exception to the rule enables the giver of the notice to convince the recipient that their mind was not in tune with their words, allowing them to retract.


Can refusing to accept a withdrawn notice count as unfair dismissal?

Although the general rule is that the employee and employer must both agree in order for a notice to be successfully withdrawn, this rule is subject to exception in the right circumstances, as a recent case demonstrates.


In 2018, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) upheld a claim that an employee was unfairly dismissed after she attempted to retract her resignation, but this was denied by her employer.


In East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust v Levy, Mrs Levy had worked in the hospital’s records department for around 10 years. Following difficulties with another colleague she successfully applied for a new role in the radiology department in order to resign from her current role. She submitted a letter to her manager which stated: “Please accept one month’s notice from the above date”.

In response, her manager replied, “Thank you for your letter … in which you tendered your notice of resignation. It is with sincere regret and disappointment that I accept your notice of resignation. I can confirm that your last day of work within Health Records will be Friday 8 [July] 2016.”


On 16 June, the job offer in the radiology department was withdrawn. This was “unofficially” due to her sick leave record. Mrs Levy tried to retract her notice but, following advice from the HR department, her manager refused to accept that request and wrote to her again confirming the date of her last day of employment, essentially forcing her to resign. Mrs Levy brought a claim of unfair dismissal and an employment tribunal (ET) ruled in her favour.

T

he ET considered that the words used in Mrs Levy’s letter were not unambiguous and could have been either a notice of intended transfer or a notice of termination. The ET concluded that the letter would lead a reasonable observer to agree that the claimant was not terminating her employment, but rather notifying her manager of her intention to accept the offer. It therefore upheld Mrs Levy’s claim that she had been unfairly dismissed when her employer insisted on holding her to her notice, so that her employment was treated as terminating.


This case turned very much on its own facts and a similar case might be decided differently by another tribunal. However, it serves to demonstrate that unless there is absolute clarity in an employee’s resignation i.e. that they are clearly signalling their intention for their employment to terminate, an employer risks a claim of unfair dismissal, especially where the employee subsequently seeks to retract their notice.


An employer should always make sure it understands why the employee has decided to resign, the notice they are giving (and whether this is subject to any conditions) and agree exactly when the employment will end.


Parliament Labour and conservatives
By lm 13 May, 2024
Is it a new dawn, a new day, and new way of life for employment? A comparison between Labour’s key proposals (in relation to some of which there is rhetoric it may be stepping back) and key steps that have already been taken or are being taken under the current Conservative government (denoted in blue)
A man in a suit and tie is sitting at a desk holding a stack of papers before an employment tribunal
By Louise Maynard 09 May, 2024
The government has recently consulted on the proposal to reintroduce modest fees in the Employment Tribunals and Employment Appeal Tribunals (closed 24 March 2024). It proposes £55 paid by the Claimant in both tribunals. One of the stated aims includes acting as an incentive to parties to settle their disputes early through ACAS without the need for claims to be brought to an Employment Tribunal.
A man is touching a woman 's shoulder at work in a case of sexual harassment.
By Marianne Wright 09 May, 2024
The UK is taking a bold step in the fight against sexual harassment by introducing a new duty for employers to take proactive measures to prevent such incidents in the workplace. This groundbreaking development, expected to come into force in October, marks a significant shift in the UK's approach to workplace safety and respect. This article delves into the details of this new legislation and its implications for employers and employees alike.
A man and a woman are giving each other a high five in front of a wind turbine.
By Marianne Wright 05 Apr, 2024
Flexible working arrangements, such as hybrid work, flexitime, and compressed hours, have become increasingly desirable for employees looking to balance work and their personal lives. As of April 6th, 2024, UK employment law has undergone significant updates to empower employees with greater flexibility and control over their work lives.
a woman is writing on a tablet while using a laptop .
By Matthew Kilgannon 20 Mar, 2024
Every April, the Government reviews and makes changes to employment laws, including a review of financial rates. Below we set out a summary of the proposed changes coming into effect in April and beyond.
A woman is giving a glass of water to a man.
By Marianne Wright 19 Mar, 2024
Bullying in the workplace is a serious issue for workers (29% of whom will experience workplace bullying at some point1), and for employers (bullying is estimated to cost UK businesses £18 billion a year2 and to contribute to the loss of over 17 million working days each year3).
A man in a suit is sitting at a desk with a laptop and talking on a cell phone.
By Louise Maynard 28 Feb, 2024
If you're an employee bringing a claim against your employer in an employment tribunal, you may be wondering who you should call as witnesses. Here are some things to consider when making your decision:
a man in a wheelchair is sitting at a desk with a woman standing next to him .
By Marianne Wright 20 Feb, 2024
In the modern workplace, fostering a culture of inclusivity and ensuring equal treatment for all employees is a crucial aspect of employment law. Discrimination based on disabilities (which can include mental health conditions) is strictly prohibited in the United Kingdom. This article explores the legal framework in UK employment law that safeguards employees against discrimination and highlights the consequences faced by employers who fail to uphold these important principles.
a man is sitting at a desk in a dark room using a laptop computer. GDPR
By Emily Kidd 06 Feb, 2024
In an era of heightened data protection awareness and stringent regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), employees play a critical role in safeguarding personal data. This article explores the legal consequences that employees may face in the United Kingdom when implicated in data protection breaches at the workplace.
person holding up a mental health book and in a discussion
By Yeing-Lang Chong 22 Jan, 2024
In recognition of the importance of employee well-being, employers in the UK are increasingly implementing well-being initiatives to support the mental health and overall well-being of their workforce. These initiatives, which can include employee assistance programs (EAPs) and wellness programs, aim to provide support, resources, and interventions that enhance employee well-being. This article explores the legal framework surrounding well-being initiatives in UK employment law and highlights the benefits and considerations for employers when implementing such programs.
More Posts
Share by: